From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Worden v. Philip Morris Usa Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Sacramento Division
Feb 20, 2015
2:08-cv-01558-JAM-KJN (E.D. Cal. Feb. 20, 2015)

Opinion

          Frank P. Kelly, Patrick J. Gregory, Annie Y.S. Chuang, Rachael M. Smith, SHOOK, HARDY & BACON L.L.P., San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Defendant, PHILIP MORRIS USA INC.

          ELAINE WHITFIELD SHARP (pro hac vice), WHITFIELD SHARP LAW OFFICE, Attorneys for Plaintiffs, JUNE M. WORDEN AND LEONARD R. WORDEN.


          STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANT PHILIP MORRIS USA INC., WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER

          JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.

         Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 41, Plaintiffs June M. Worden and Leonard R. Worden ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant Philip Morris USA Inc. ("PM USA") by and through their respective counsel, hereby jointly request that the complaint and all claims asserted in the above-referenced action by and between Plaintiffs and PM USA be dismissed with prejudice.

         IT IS SO STIPULATED.

         ORDER

         Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 and the stipulation between Plaintiffs June M. Worden and Leonard R. Worden and Defendant Philip Morris USA Inc., Plaintiffs' complaint and all claims asserted in therein against Defendant Philip Morris USA Inc. is dismissed with prejudice.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Worden v. Philip Morris Usa Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Sacramento Division
Feb 20, 2015
2:08-cv-01558-JAM-KJN (E.D. Cal. Feb. 20, 2015)
Case details for

Worden v. Philip Morris Usa Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JUNE M. WORDEN and LEONARD R. WORDEN, Plaintiffs, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Sacramento Division

Date published: Feb 20, 2015

Citations

2:08-cv-01558-JAM-KJN (E.D. Cal. Feb. 20, 2015)