From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wooten v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Oct 29, 2014
Case No. 13-Civ-22798-COOKE/WHITE (S.D. Fla. Oct. 29, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 13-Civ-22798-COOKE/WHITE

10-29-2014

CHARLES WOOTEN, Movant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


(04-Cr-20487-COOKE)

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

THIS MATTER was referred to the Honorable Patrick A. White, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B), Rules 8 and 10 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Cases in the United States District Courts, and Administrative Order 2003-19 of this Court, for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters, ECF No. 3. On March 14, 2014, Judge White issued a Report of Magistrate Judge, ECF No. 9, recommending: (i) that Charles Wooten's Motion to Vacate Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 225, ECF No. 1, be dismissed because he failed to bring it within the one-year limitations period prescribed by statute; (ii) that a certificate of appealability be denied; (iii) that the case be closed.

On April 10, 2014, Movant Charles Wooten objected to the Report of Magistrate Judge, ECF No. 10. However, Wooten failed to demonstrate new facts or establish that he is entitled to equitable tolling of the one-year limitations period. After consideration of Judge White's Report and Recommendation, Wooten's objections, and a de novo review of the record, I find Judge White's Report and Recommendation clear, cogent, and compelling.

It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Judge White's Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 9, with respect to the merits of the case is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED. Accordingly, the Motion to Vacate Sentence, ECF No. 1, is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this case.

It is FURTHER ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Petitioner has not demonstrated that "jurists of reason could disagree with the district court's resolution of his constitutional claims or that jurists could conclude the issues presented are adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further." Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 326 (2003); accord Lott v. Attorney Gen., Fla., 594 F.3d 1296, 1301 (11th Cir. 2010) (explaining that a "petitioner need not show he will ultimately succeed on appeal" in order to warrant a certificate of appealability). Accordingly, this Court DENIES a Certificate of Appealability in this case.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, in Miami, Florida, this 29th day of October 2014.

/s/_________

MARCIA G. COOKE

United States District Judge
Copies furnished to:
Patrick A. White, U.S. Magistrate Judge
Counsel of record Charles Wooten, pro se
Prisoner No. 48785-004
Talladega Federal Correctional Institution
Inmate Mail/Parcels
Post Office Box 1000
Talladega, Alabama 35160


Summaries of

Wooten v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Oct 29, 2014
Case No. 13-Civ-22798-COOKE/WHITE (S.D. Fla. Oct. 29, 2014)
Case details for

Wooten v. United States

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES WOOTEN, Movant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Date published: Oct 29, 2014

Citations

Case No. 13-Civ-22798-COOKE/WHITE (S.D. Fla. Oct. 29, 2014)