From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wooten v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Oct 16, 2018
559 S.W.3d 114 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

No. ED 105810

10-16-2018

Casitdel WOOTEN, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

Randall Brachman, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Movant/Appellant. Garrick F. D. Aplin, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Respondent/Respondent.


Randall Brachman, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Movant/Appellant.

Garrick F. D. Aplin, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Respondent/Respondent.

Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Casitdel Wooten appeals the motion court’s judgment dismissing his Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and we conclude the motion court did not err. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Wooten v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Oct 16, 2018
559 S.W.3d 114 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Wooten v. State

Case Details

Full title:Casitdel WOOTEN, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Date published: Oct 16, 2018

Citations

559 S.W.3d 114 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)