From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wooster Associates v. Lates

Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Waterbury
Jan 7, 1991
1991 Ct. Sup. 52 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1991)

Opinion

No. 099552

January 7, 1991.


ORDER


The respondent has failed to establish probable cause to support a finding that the construction services he provided were provided "by virtue of an agreement with or the consent of the [applicant] or by the consent of some person having authority from or rightfully acting for [the applicant]. . ." Newtown Associates v. Northeast Structures, Inc., 15 Conn. App. 633, 637 (1988). More specifically, there is no evidence of an agreement or of the kind of consent required by law. Avery v. Smith, 96 Conn. 223, 228 (1921); Newtown Associates v. Northeast Structures, Inc., supra 640.

The application is granted and the lien therein described is discharged.

So ordered.

GAFFNEY, J.


Summaries of

Wooster Associates v. Lates

Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Waterbury
Jan 7, 1991
1991 Ct. Sup. 52 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1991)
Case details for

Wooster Associates v. Lates

Case Details

Full title:WOOSTER ASSOCIATES v. RALPH E. LATES

Court:Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Waterbury

Date published: Jan 7, 1991

Citations

1991 Ct. Sup. 52 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1991)