From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woolfolk v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 17, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-2713 GEB KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-2713 GEB KJN P Court of Appeals No. 12-15034

01-17-2012

RANDY WOOLFOLK, Plaintiff, v. EDMUND G. BROWN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

This matter is before the court on the referral of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for the limited purpose of determining whether in forma pauperis status should continue for plaintiff's appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). The court should revoke a litigant's in forma pauperis status if an appeal is frivolous or taken in bad faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Hooker v. Am. Airlines, 302 F.3d 1091, 1092 (9th Cir.2002) (recognizing that revocation of in forma pauperis status is appropriate where a district court finds the appeal to be frivolous). An action is frivolous if it has "no arguable basis in fact or law." Franklin v. Murphy, 745 F.2d 1221, 1228 (9th Cir. 1984).

In the instant case, plaintiff's appeal is legally frivolous. (Dkt. No. 6 at 3.) Thus, plaintiff's in forma pauperis status is revoked. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). The Clerk of this court shall promptly transmit a copy of this order to the Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

_______________

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Woolfolk v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 17, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-2713 GEB KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2012)
Case details for

Woolfolk v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:RANDY WOOLFOLK, Plaintiff, v. EDMUND G. BROWN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 17, 2012

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-2713 GEB KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2012)