From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woolf v. Woolf

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Mar 11, 1946
328 Ill. App. 319 (Ill. App. Ct. 1946)

Opinion

Gen. No. 43,530. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed March 11, 1946 Released for publication March 25, 1946

HUSBAND AND WIFE, § 219.2when decree for separate maintenance will not be disturbed on merits. On husband's appeal from separate maintenance decree in favor of wife who charged husband with refusing to renew lease on their apartment and who testified to admissions by husband of his infatuation for another woman and his desire for separation, held that, under evidence, decree would not be disturbed on its merits.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. WILLIAM J. LINDSAY, Judge, presiding.

Affirmed except as to allowance of attorney's fees, as to which cause is remanded with directions to fix at $1,000; all costs of appeal taxed against defendant. Heard in the first division, first district, this court at the October term, 1945.

Bernard J. Brown and Jesse H. Brown, for appellant;

Cantwell Cantwell, for appellee;

Robert E. Cantwell, Jr. and Louis Yager Cantwell, of counsel.


Not to be published in full. Opinion filed March 11, 1946; released for publication March 25, 1946.


Summaries of

Woolf v. Woolf

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District
Mar 11, 1946
328 Ill. App. 319 (Ill. App. Ct. 1946)
Case details for

Woolf v. Woolf

Case Details

Full title:Isabel F. Woolf, Appellee, v. Irving W. Woolf, Appellant

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, First District

Date published: Mar 11, 1946

Citations

328 Ill. App. 319 (Ill. App. Ct. 1946)
65 N.E.2d 485

Citing Cases

Scott v. Ashcraft

[7] It is well established that in reviewing a case of this type that this court must keep in mind that the…

Handrich v. Handrich

Durbin v. Durbin, 315 Ill. App. 238. It has been repeatedly held that the credibility of witnesses and the…