From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woodyard v. Ryan

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 27, 2013
546 F. App'x 700 (9th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

Decided November 18, 2013

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 32.1)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. D.C. No. 2:13-cv-00342-SLG-JFM. Sharon L. Gleason, District Judge, Presiding.

ALLEN WOODYARD, Plaintiff - Appellant, Pro se, Florence, AZ.

For CHARLES L. RYAN, RICHARD PRATT, Health Program Evaluation Administrator, Defendants - Appellees: Kelley J. Morrissey, Assistant Attorney General, Arizona Attorney General's Office, Phoenix, AZ.


Before: SILVERMAN, BYBEE and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Allen Woodyard appeals pro se the district court's denial of his request for preliminary injunctive relief against defendant prison officials. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.

Our sole inquiry is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying preliminary injunctive relief, and we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 555 U.S. 7, 24, 129 S.Ct. 365, 172 L.Ed.2d 249 (2008) (listing factors for district court to consider); Sports Form, Inc. v. United Press Int'l, 686 F.2d 750, 752-53 (9th Cir. 1982) (explaining limited scope of review).

Appellant's motion to expedite is denied as moot.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Woodyard v. Ryan

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 27, 2013
546 F. App'x 700 (9th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Woodyard v. Ryan

Case Details

Full title:ALLEN WOODYARD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CHARLES L. RYAN; et al.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Nov 27, 2013

Citations

546 F. App'x 700 (9th Cir. 2013)