From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woodson v. Mendon Leasing Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 9, 1999
259 A.D.2d 304 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

March 9, 1999

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stanley Green, J.).


Having previously prevailed upon their argument that Mendon was not a party to the default judgment against John Densby and that the action as against Mendon had been severed, thus enabling Mendon to conduct discovery and litigate the issues, plaintiffs are judicially estopped from now arguing that the default judgment against Densby should be given res judicata and collateral estoppel effect against Mendon ( see, Madden v. Corey, 251 A.D.2d 257). In any event, Mendon was not in privity with Densby, and did not have a full and fair opportunity to litigate either the issues of liability or damages ( see, Frolish v. Ryder Truck Rental, 63 A.D.2d 799).

Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Wallach, Rubin and Andrias, JJ.


Summaries of

Woodson v. Mendon Leasing Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 9, 1999
259 A.D.2d 304 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Woodson v. Mendon Leasing Corp.

Case Details

Full title:ZACHARY WOODSON, an Infant, by His Mother and Natural Guardian, TRACY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 9, 1999

Citations

259 A.D.2d 304 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
686 N.Y.S.2d 411

Citing Cases

Zeidel v. City of New York

"The judgment obtained by the plaintiff as against a defaulting defendant is not entitled to collateral…

Watrous v. Autera

We cannot agree. Plaintiffs' default judgment was entered solely against Autera. It cannot be given…