From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woods v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON
Jun 15, 2018
Civil Action No. 2:16-cv-05720 (S.D.W. Va. Jun. 15, 2018)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 2:16-cv-05720 Criminal Action No. 2:97-cr-00117

06-15-2018

SHEDDRIC L. WOODS, Movant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

This action was previously referred to Cheryl A. Eifert, United States Magistrate Judge, who has submitted her Proposed Findings and Recommendation ("PF&R") pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

The court has reviewed the PF&R entered by the magistrate judge on December 7, 2017. The magistrate judge recommends "that the Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 be denied as untimely; the motion to withdraw the referral to the undersigned and stay this action be denied, as moot; and that this action be dismissed, with prejudice, and removed from the docket of the Court." (PF&R 6 (emphases and citations omitted).) The movant, represented by counsel, objects to the magistrate judge's conclusion that his Section 2255 motion was untimely filed. However, the movant recognizes "that this Court is currently bound by the Fourth Circuit's decision in United States v. Brown, 868 F.3d 297 (4th Cir. 2017), to find that his petition is untimely filed." (Obj. 1.) The movant's counsel notes that he "is aware that counsel in [Brown] intend to pursue the matter to the Supreme Court if necessary." (Id. 2.) Thus, the movant "makes [his] objection to preserve the issue for further review." (Id.)

For the foregoing reasons, it is ORDERED that:

1. The PF&R be, and hereby is, adopted by the court;

2. The movant's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 be, and hereby is, denied as untimely;

3. The motion to withdraw the referral to the magistrate judge and stay this action be, and hereby is, denied as moot; and

4. This action be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice and removed from the docket of the court.

The Clerk is directed to forward copies of this written opinion and order to all counsel of record, to any unrepresented parties, and to the United States Magistrate Judge.

ENTER: June 15, 2018

/s/_________

John T. Copenhaver, Jr.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Woods v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON
Jun 15, 2018
Civil Action No. 2:16-cv-05720 (S.D.W. Va. Jun. 15, 2018)
Case details for

Woods v. United States

Case Details

Full title:SHEDDRIC L. WOODS, Movant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON

Date published: Jun 15, 2018

Citations

Civil Action No. 2:16-cv-05720 (S.D.W. Va. Jun. 15, 2018)