Opinion
No. 68183
07-21-2015
IAN ARMESE WOODS, Petitioner, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.
An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.
ORDER DENYING PETITION
This is an original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenging a district court order designating petitioner Ian Woods a vexatious litigant and restricting his access to the courts. Woods contends that he was not warned in advance of the district court's intent to designate him a vexatious litigant and that his filings were not frivolous or intended to harass the court. Woods has failed to submit an appendix with documents from the district court action, see NEAP 21(a)(4), and also has failed to serve the petition upon the respondent, see NRAP 21(a)(1). Thus, he has not demonstrated circumstances warranting our review. See Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) ("Petitioners carry the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."). Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.
/s/_________, J.
Saitta
/s/_________, J.
Gibbons
/s/_________, J.
Pickering
cc: Hon. Jessie Elizabeth Walsh, District Judge
Ian Armese Woods
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
Eighth District Court Clerk