From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woods v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Jun 15, 2012
93 So. 3d 1066 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. 2D10–5658.

2012-06-15

Michael Nathaniel WOODS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Thomas P. Barber, Judge. James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Kevin Briggs, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Michael Nathaniel Woods, pro se.


Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Thomas P. Barber, Judge.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Kevin Briggs, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Michael Nathaniel Woods, pro se.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ronald Napolitano, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders appeal Michael Nathaniel Woods, pro se and through counsel, raised two potential issues for review that have not been preserved by a motion to withdraw plea as to one issue and by a motion to correct sentencing error pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b) as to the other issue. We affirm without prejudice to any right Woods may have to raise the issues in a postconviction motion.

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

SILBERMAN, C.J., and NORTHCUTT and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.




Summaries of

Woods v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Jun 15, 2012
93 So. 3d 1066 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Woods v. State

Case Details

Full title:Michael Nathaniel WOODS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Date published: Jun 15, 2012

Citations

93 So. 3d 1066 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)