In Woods, the Indiana court of appeals found that the trial court's unambiguous oral sentencing statement was inconsistent with the trial court's abstract of judgment and remanded to correct the clerical error.
Summary of this case from Trent v. SmithNo. 48A04-0909-CR-532.
April 8, 2010.
Disposition of Cases by Unpublished Memorandum Decision Affirmed and Remanded.
NAJAM, J. Concurs.
BROWN, J. Concurs.
In Woods, the Indiana court of appeals found that the trial court's unambiguous oral sentencing statement was inconsistent with the trial court's abstract of judgment and remanded to correct the clerical error.
Summary of this case from Trent v. SmithFull title:Woods v. State
Court:Court of Appeals of Indiana
Date published: Apr 8, 2010
Trent was given credit for the actual time he spent in prison or jail (4 years and 53 days) as well as all…