From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woods v. Rodgers

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION
Mar 6, 2012
CASE NO. 2:11-CV-240-WKW (M.D. Ala. Mar. 6, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:11-CV-240-WKW

03-06-2012

TIMOTHY WOODS, Plaintiff, v. SHERIFF RAYMOND RODGERS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

There being no objections filed to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 47), and upon an independent review of the file in this case, it is ORDERED as follows:

(1) The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED;

(2) Defendant Dr. Tahir Siddiq's motion for summary judgment (Doc. # 12) is GRANTED;

(3) This action is DISMISSED as to Defendant Siddiq with prejudice;

(4) Defendants Rodgers's and Pritchett's motion to dismiss (Doc. # 25) is GRANTED due to Plaintiff's failure to exhaust available administrative remedies available during Plaintiff's confinement at Bullock County Jail (see 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a));

(5) This action is DISMISSED with prejudice as to Defendants Rodgers and Pritchett; and

(6) All costs incurred are TAXED against Plaintiff.

An appropriate judgment will be entered.

W. Keith Watkins

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDG


Summaries of

Woods v. Rodgers

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION
Mar 6, 2012
CASE NO. 2:11-CV-240-WKW (M.D. Ala. Mar. 6, 2012)
Case details for

Woods v. Rodgers

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY WOODS, Plaintiff, v. SHERIFF RAYMOND RODGERS, et al., Defendants.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 6, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 2:11-CV-240-WKW (M.D. Ala. Mar. 6, 2012)

Citing Cases

Johnson v. Solomon

1234514 (M.D. Ala. Apr. 1, 2021) (stating that “Foster's claims are therefore subject to review under the Due…