Woods v. Marshall

Full title: EARNEST C. WOODS, Petitioner, v. JOHN MARSHALL, Warden, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Nov 29, 2011

CV 09-7300-JAK (OP) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2011)

Opinion

EARNEST C. WOODS, Petitioner, v. JOHN MARSHALL, Warden, Respondent. No. CV 09-7300-JAK (OP) United States District Court, C.D. California. November 29, 2011

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          JOHN A. KRONSTADT, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, the Amended Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and Petitioner's Objections thereto. The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Amended Report and Recommendation to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge,

         IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered: (1) approving and adopting this Amended Report and Recommendation; 2) denying Respondent's Motion to Dismiss the Petition as moot; and (3) directing that Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.