From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woods v. City of Bedford

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
May 31, 2022
4:21-cv-1373-P (N.D. Tex. May. 31, 2022)

Opinion

4:21-cv-1373-P

05-31-2022

Stephen Lamar Woods, Plaintiff. v. City of Bedford, Texas, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Mark T. Pittman, United States District Judge.

United States Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation (“FCR”) in this case on May 10, 2022. ECF No. 9. No objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge's FCR is ripe for review. The undersigned reviewed the FCR for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge believes that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct.

Therefore, the Court ADOPTS the reasoning in the Magistrate Judge's FCR. Accordingly, Plaintiff's claims against Bedford Police Department pending in this action are DISMISSED without prejudice.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Woods v. City of Bedford

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
May 31, 2022
4:21-cv-1373-P (N.D. Tex. May. 31, 2022)
Case details for

Woods v. City of Bedford

Case Details

Full title:Stephen Lamar Woods, Plaintiff. v. City of Bedford, Texas, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Texas

Date published: May 31, 2022

Citations

4:21-cv-1373-P (N.D. Tex. May. 31, 2022)