From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woodruff v. Toezpecunia, Inc.

United States District Court, District of Oregon
May 30, 2024
Civ. 6:22-cv-639-MK (D. Or. May. 30, 2024)

Opinion

Civ. 6:22-cv-639-MK

05-30-2024

HEYLI WOODRUFF, Plaintiff, v. TOEZPECUNIA, INC., Defendants.


ORDER

MICHAEL J. MCSHANE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Magistrate Judge Mustafa Kasubhai filed a Findings and Recommendation, (ECF No. 64), and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). Defendants filed objections. ECF No. 66. Accordingly, the Court reviewed the file of this case de novo. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981).

The Court finds no error and concludes the report is correct. Magistrate Judge Kasubhai's Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 64) is ADOPTED. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 34) is DENIED. Plaintiffs' Motions for Summary Judgment (ECF Nos. 36, 57) are GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Woodruff v. Toezpecunia, Inc.

United States District Court, District of Oregon
May 30, 2024
Civ. 6:22-cv-639-MK (D. Or. May. 30, 2024)
Case details for

Woodruff v. Toezpecunia, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:HEYLI WOODRUFF, Plaintiff, v. TOEZPECUNIA, INC., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Oregon

Date published: May 30, 2024

Citations

Civ. 6:22-cv-639-MK (D. Or. May. 30, 2024)