From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woodruff v. Brown

United States District Court, N.D. California
Aug 4, 2004
No. C 04-1476 MMC (PR) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 4, 2004)

Opinion

No. C 04-1476 MMC (PR).

August 4, 2004


ORDER OF DISMISSAL


The above-titled habeas petition was filed April 15, 2004 by a California prisoner proceeding pro se. That same date, the court notified petitioner that the in forma pauperis application he submitted was insufficient because he did not attach a copy of his prisoner trust account statement showing transactions for the last six months. A return envelope was provided to petitioner with the notice. Petitioner was informed that if he did not respond within thirty days, the case would be dismissed. Petitioner has not responded. The action is therefore DISMISSED without prejudice.

The Clerk shall close the file and terminate all pending motions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

[X] Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED the action is DISMISSED without prejudice.


Summaries of

Woodruff v. Brown

United States District Court, N.D. California
Aug 4, 2004
No. C 04-1476 MMC (PR) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 4, 2004)
Case details for

Woodruff v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:STEVE WOODRUFF, Petitioner, v. JILL BROWN, Acting Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Aug 4, 2004

Citations

No. C 04-1476 MMC (PR) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 4, 2004)