From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woodley v. Encore Recycling

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Dec 29, 2021
Civil Action 3:21-CV-2240-C-BN (N.D. Tex. Dec. 29, 2021)

Opinion

Civil Action 3:21-CV-2240-C-BN

12-29-2021

GEORGE WILLIAM WOODLEY, JR., Plaintiff, v. ENCORE RECYCLING, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

SAM R. CUMMINGS, SENIOR UWTED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court are the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge therein advising the Court that this civil action should be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

Plaintiff has failed to file objections to the United States Magistrate Judge's Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation and the time to do so has now expired.

The Court has reviewed the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for clear error and finds none. It is therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court. For the reasons stated therein, the Court ORDERS that this civil action be DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Woodley v. Encore Recycling

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Dec 29, 2021
Civil Action 3:21-CV-2240-C-BN (N.D. Tex. Dec. 29, 2021)
Case details for

Woodley v. Encore Recycling

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE WILLIAM WOODLEY, JR., Plaintiff, v. ENCORE RECYCLING, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Texas

Date published: Dec 29, 2021

Citations

Civil Action 3:21-CV-2240-C-BN (N.D. Tex. Dec. 29, 2021)

Citing Cases

Prescott v. Catoe

But, “insofar as this dismissal may somehow prejudice” Plaintiff, this “recommendation afford[s] him notice,…