From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woodard v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jan 25, 2007
946 So. 2d 1186 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Opinion

Nos. 1D05-2844, 1D05-3065, 1D05-3068.

December 22, 2006. Rehearing Denied January 25, 2007.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Levy County. Joseph E. Smith, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Phil Patterson, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Charlie Crist, Attorney General, and Felicia A. Wilcox, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


AFFIRMED. See Jones v. State, 876 So.2d 642, 644-45 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (stating that a revocation of probation proceeding is merely an extension of the sentencing process and is, thus, subject to its preservation requirements and that sentencing errors are not reviewable on direct appeal unless they are preserved in the trial court by a contemporaneous objection at sentencing or by a motion timely filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)); see also Brannon v. State, 850 So.2d 452, 456 (Fla. 2003) (holding that even a fundamental sentencing error cannot be raised on direct appeal if it is not first preserved in the trial court by an objection or a motion to correct sentence).

BROWNING, C.J., DAVIS, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Woodard v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jan 25, 2007
946 So. 2d 1186 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)
Case details for

Woodard v. State

Case Details

Full title:Tyronza A. WOODARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jan 25, 2007

Citations

946 So. 2d 1186 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Citing Cases

Davis v. State

This court has repeatedly held that sentencing errors such as the error raised here must be preserved by…