From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Woodard v. Lane

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ROCK HILL DIVISION
Jun 25, 2012
C/A No.: 0:12-446-CMC-SVH (D.S.C. Jun. 25, 2012)

Opinion

C/A No.: 0:12-446-CMC-SVH

06-25-2012

Susan Woodard, Plaintiff, v. Levert Lane, Aldi Incorporation, and Brian Hammond Defendant.


ORDER

This matter comes before the court on Defendant Aldi's motion to substitute counsel [Entry #58]. Prior to ruling on the pending motion, the court requires Aldi's intended substitute counsel to file a statement adopting the pro hac vice motions previously submitted and acknowledging the obligations of local counsel in compliance with Local Civil Rules 83.I.04, 83.I.05, and 83.I.06.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

June 25, 2012

Columbia, South Carolina

Shiva V. Hodges

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Woodard v. Lane

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ROCK HILL DIVISION
Jun 25, 2012
C/A No.: 0:12-446-CMC-SVH (D.S.C. Jun. 25, 2012)
Case details for

Woodard v. Lane

Case Details

Full title:Susan Woodard, Plaintiff, v. Levert Lane, Aldi Incorporation, and Brian…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ROCK HILL DIVISION

Date published: Jun 25, 2012

Citations

C/A No.: 0:12-446-CMC-SVH (D.S.C. Jun. 25, 2012)