Opinion
C/A No.: 0:12-446-CMC-SVH
06-25-2012
ORDER
This matter comes before the court on Defendant Aldi's motion to substitute counsel [Entry #58]. Prior to ruling on the pending motion, the court requires Aldi's intended substitute counsel to file a statement adopting the pro hac vice motions previously submitted and acknowledging the obligations of local counsel in compliance with Local Civil Rules 83.I.04, 83.I.05, and 83.I.06.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
June 25, 2012
Columbia, South Carolina
Shiva V. Hodges
United States Magistrate Judge