Summary
stating that the disability onset date, not the application date, is the proper date to use in determining materiality
Summary of this case from Gray v. ColvinOpinion
CASE NO. 5:12-CV-357-D
08-12-2013
DELMAR C. WOODALL, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.
JUDGMENT
Decision by the Court:
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Court ADOPTS the Memorandum and Recommendations [D.E. 32]. Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [D.E. 24] is GRANTED, Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [D.E. 27] is DENIED, and the action is REMANDED to the Commissioner under sentence 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). THE ABOVE JUDGMENT WAS ENTERED TODAY, AUGUST 12, 2013, WITH A COPY TO: Charlotte Williams Hall (via CM/ECF electronic notification)
Wanda D. Mason (via CM/ECF electronic notification)
JULIE A. RICHARDS, Clerk
Eastern District of North Carolina
___________
(By) Deputy Clerk
Raleigh, North Carolina