From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wood v. Ryan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Jul 20, 2014
No. CV-14-2236-TUC-JGZ (D. Ariz. Jul. 20, 2014)

Opinion

No. CV-14-2236-TUC-JGZ

07-20-2014

Joseph Rudolph Wood, III, Petitioner, v. Charles L. Ryan, et al., Respondents.


Death Penalty Case


Order

Petitioner Joseph Wood is an Arizona death row inmate. His execution is scheduled for July 23, 2014. On Friday, July 18, 2014, he filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Motion for Stay of Execution in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. (Doc. 1.) The Court of Appeals transferred the case to this Court pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 22(a). (Id., Ex. 1.)

Petitioner seeks relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. He claims that the Arizona Supreme Court unconstitutionally rejected mitigating evidence by applying a causal connection test. See Tennard v. Dretke, 524 U.S. 37 (2004). He seeks a stay of his execution pending the outcome of en banc review in McKinney v. Ryan, No. 09-99018 (9th Cir.), which will address the question of whether "Tennard error" is subject to harmless error review.

Petitioner's § 2241 petition will be denied. Section 2254 is the exclusive avenue for state prisoners to challenge the legality of their imprisonment pursuant to the judgment of a state court. See Felker v. Turpin, 518 U.S. 651, 662 (1996) ("Our authority to grant habeas relief to state prisoners is limited by § 2254."); Rittenberry v. Morgan, 468 F.3d 331, 336 (6th Cir. 2006) ("[I]f a habeas petition could so easily avoid the strict requirements of AEDPA, nobody would file under section 2254, and the statute would become a nullity"); Greenawalt v. Stewart, 105 F.3d 1287, 1287 (9th Cir. 1997) ("The Supreme Court has instructed us that the authority of the federal courts to grant habeas relief to state prisoners under § 2241 is limited by 28 U.S.C. § 2254."); Stotts v. Luna, 46 Fed.Appx. 523 (9th Cir. 2001) ("Although Petitioner styles his petition as one under section 2241, he is, as a state prisoner, limited by the restrictions of 28 U.S.C. § 2254.").

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Motion for a Stay of Execution is DENIED. (Doc. 1.)

__________

Jennifer G. Zipps

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Wood v. Ryan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Jul 20, 2014
No. CV-14-2236-TUC-JGZ (D. Ariz. Jul. 20, 2014)
Case details for

Wood v. Ryan

Case Details

Full title:Joseph Rudolph Wood, III, Petitioner, v. Charles L. Ryan, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Date published: Jul 20, 2014

Citations

No. CV-14-2236-TUC-JGZ (D. Ariz. Jul. 20, 2014)