From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wood v. Plummer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Jan 23, 2013
Case No. 3:11-CV-32 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 23, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:11-CV-32

01-23-2013

MARK A. WOOD, Plaintiff, v. PHIL PLUMMER, et al., Defendants.


District Judge Thomas M. Rose

Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman


ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF

TIME TO FILE A PROPOSED JOINT FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER (DOC. 46)

This matter is before the Court upon Defendants' unopposed motion for an extension of time to file a proposed joint final pretrial order due on January 18, 2013. Doc. 46. For good cause shown, and in light of the undersigned's recently issued Report and Recommendation that all of Plaintiff's claims be dismissed (doc. 47) -- Defendants' motion (doc. 46) is GRANTED. The proposed joint final pretrial order is due on or before February 15, 2013. The final pretrial conference date and the trial date remain the same.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Michael J. Newman

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Wood v. Plummer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Jan 23, 2013
Case No. 3:11-CV-32 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 23, 2013)
Case details for

Wood v. Plummer

Case Details

Full title:MARK A. WOOD, Plaintiff, v. PHIL PLUMMER, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Jan 23, 2013

Citations

Case No. 3:11-CV-32 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 23, 2013)