From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wood v. Mass. Dep't of Transp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Feb 26, 2013
Civil Action No. 13-CV-10115 (D. Mass. Feb. 26, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 13-CV-10115

02-26-2013

DR. WILLIAM WOOD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ON PRO SE APPEARANCE OF

GREEN LINE ADVISORY GROUP FOR MEDFORD

SAYLOR, J.

Dr. William Wood, Carolyn Rosen-Wood, and the Green Line Advisory Group for Medford have brought this action against the Massachusetts Department of Transportation, and related parties, alleging that defendants violated the National Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 4321-4347. Plaintiffs seek a court order enjoining defendants from proceeding with the Green Line Extension Project that proposes infrastructure modifications to the rail lines in Medford, Massachusetts.

No counsel has entered an appearance for plaintiffs. An organizational entity must appear in this Court only by an authorized attorney. See, e.g., Duquette v. Stern, 2011 WL 468783, *1 (D. Mass. 2011); Volumetric Imaging, Inc. v. Teledyne, Inc., 194 F.R.D. 373, 374 (D. Mass. 2000). Because an organizational entity may not proceed pro se, the Court will give plaintiff Green Line Advisory Group for Medford 30 days to obtain counsel. Accordingly, the Green Line Advisory Group for Medford must obtain counsel by March 28, 2013, or its claims will be dismissed.

So Ordered.

________________________

F. Dennis Saylor IV

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Wood v. Mass. Dep't of Transp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Feb 26, 2013
Civil Action No. 13-CV-10115 (D. Mass. Feb. 26, 2013)
Case details for

Wood v. Mass. Dep't of Transp.

Case Details

Full title:DR. WILLIAM WOOD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Date published: Feb 26, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 13-CV-10115 (D. Mass. Feb. 26, 2013)