Wood v. Lackner

Full title: ROBERT WOOD, Petitioner, v. HEIDI LACKNER, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jun 23, 2015

2:15-cv-1288 AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 23, 2015)

Opinion

ROBERT WOOD, Petitioner, v. HEIDI LACKNER, Respondent. No. 2:15-cv-1288 AC P United States District Court, E.D. California. June 23, 2015

          ORDER

          ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.

         Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In his application, petitioner challenges a disciplinary hearing at Sierra Conservation Center in Tuolumne County. Tuolumne County is part of the Fresno Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 120(d).

         Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper division of a court may, on the court's own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court.

         Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California sitting in Fresno; and

         2. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be filed at:

         Save trees - read court opinions online on Google Scholar.