From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wood v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION
Mar 28, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16-6502 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 28, 2017)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16-6502

03-28-2017

RANDY WOOD, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Pending before the Court is Defendant's Partial Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 11) pursuant to Federal Rule 12(b)(6). This case involves a challenge to the Social Security Administration's redetermination process found in 42 U.S.C. § 405(u). A full discussion of Plaintiff's background and disability can be found in this Court's previous order denying a preliminary injunction. See Mem. Op. & Order, ECF No. 19, at 1-2.

Plaintiff's challenges to the redetermination process replicate similar legal challenges brought to this Court in Robertson v. Berryhill, Civ. No. 3:16-3846 (S.D.W. Va.), in Dillon v. Berryhill, Civ. No. 2:16-4330 (S.D.W. Va.), and in Milam v. Berryhill, Civ. No. 2:16-6002 (S.D.W. Va.). The Court granted the Acting Commissioner's motions to dismiss in all of these cases, with detailed analyses in Robertson and Dillon. See Robertson, ECF No. 40; Dillon, ECF No. 13. As these opinions cover all of Plaintiff's challenges, the Court finds it unnecessary to repeat the analysis here. Therefore, the Court incorporates the opinions from Robertson and Dillon herein and directs the parties to those opinions for a full discussion on why Plaintiff's procedural challenges fail to state a claim.

Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendant's Partial Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 11). As the Defendant interpreted the complaint to include a substantive challenge regarding the Administrative Law Judge's final determination, the Court will allow this claim to continue. See Def.'s Partial Mot. to Dismiss, ECF No. 11, at 4 n.3. Whether the decision to terminate Plaintiff's benefits was based on substantial evidence, therefore, remains pending. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to refer the remaining claim to the magistrate judge pursuant to this Court's Standing Order (ECF No. 3).

The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented parties.

ENTER: March 28, 2017

/s/_________

ROBERT C. CHAMBERS, CHIEF JUDGE


Summaries of

Wood v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION
Mar 28, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16-6502 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 28, 2017)
Case details for

Wood v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:RANDY WOOD, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of the…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION

Date published: Mar 28, 2017

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16-6502 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 28, 2017)