From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wolk v. Widlansky

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Feb 28, 1949
1 N.J. 491 (N.J. 1949)

Opinion

Argued February 21, 1949 —

Decided February 28, 1949.

Mr. Samuel H. Nelson argued the cause for the complainant-appellant ( Mr. Herman H. Anekstein, attorney). Mr. Stephen V.R. Strong argued the cause for the defendants-respondents ( Messrs. Strong Strong, attorneys)


The decree under review will be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Vice Chancellor Jayne in the former Court of Chancery.

For affirmance: Chief Justice VANDERBILT and Justices CASE, HEHER, WACHENFELD, BURLING, and ACKERSON — 6.

For reversal: None.


Summaries of

Wolk v. Widlansky

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Feb 28, 1949
1 N.J. 491 (N.J. 1949)
Case details for

Wolk v. Widlansky

Case Details

Full title:SIMON WOLK, COMPLAINANT-APPELLANT, v. WILLIAM WIDLANSKY, ET ALS.…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Feb 28, 1949

Citations

1 N.J. 491 (N.J. 1949)

Citing Cases

Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services

Riverton Country Club v. Thomas, 1 N.J. 508, 64 A.2d 347 (1948). Wolk v. Widlansky, 1 N.J. 491, 64 A.2d 230…