From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wolinski v. McDonald

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 10, 2015
Case No. CV 11-8649 JFW (MRW) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 10, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. CV 11-8649 JFW (MRW)

12-10-2015

KRZYSZTOF WOLINSKI, Petitioner, v. MIKE McDONALD, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court reviewed the petition, the records on file, and the two Reports and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. (Docket # 122, 156.) Petitioner did not file any written objections to either report. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Ground Three of the First Amended Petition is dismissed as unexhausted; (2) Petitioner's request for a stay of the action is denied; and (3) judgment be entered denying the First Amended Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice. DATE: December 10, 2015

/s/_________

HON. JOHN F. WALTER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Wolinski v. McDonald

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 10, 2015
Case No. CV 11-8649 JFW (MRW) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 10, 2015)
Case details for

Wolinski v. McDonald

Case Details

Full title:KRZYSZTOF WOLINSKI, Petitioner, v. MIKE McDONALD, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 10, 2015

Citations

Case No. CV 11-8649 JFW (MRW) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 10, 2015)