From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wolfson v. Concannon

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Sep 26, 2014
768 F.3d 999 (9th Cir. 2014)

Opinion

No. 11–17634.

2014-09-26

Randolph WOLFSON, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Colleen CONCANNON, in her official capacity as member of the Arizona Commission on Judicial Conduct; Louis Frank Dominguez, in his official capacity as member of the Arizona Commission on Judicial Conduct; Peter J. Eckerstrom, in his official capacity as member of the Arizona Commission on Judicial Conduct; George H. Foster, in his official capacity as member of the Arizona Commission on Judicial Conduct; Gustavo Aragon, Jr., in his official capacity as member of the Arizona Commission on Judicial Conduct; Roger Barton, in his official capacity as member of the Arizona Commission on Judicial Conduct; Anna Mary Glaab, in her official capacity as secretary of the Arizona Commission on Judicial Conduct; S' Lee Hinshaw, in his official capacity as member of the Arizona Commission on Judicial Conduct; David Stevens, in his official capacity as member of the Arizona Commission on Judicial Conduct; J. Tyrell Taber, in his official capacity as member of the Arizona Commission on Judicial Conduct; Lawrence F. Winthrop, in his official capacity as member of the Arizona Commission on Judicial Conduct; Maret Vessella, Chief Bar Counsel of the State Bar of Arizona, Defendants–Appellees.

Byron Jeffords Babione, Esquire, Benjamin Wyman Bull, Esquire, Chief Counsel, Scottsdale, AZ, James Bopp, Jr., Esquire, Anita Yvonne Woudenberg, Terre Haute, IN, for Plaintiff–Appellant. Charles Arnold Grube, Assistant Attorney General, Paula S. Bickett, Esquire, Chief Counsel, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendants–Appellees.


Byron Jeffords Babione, Esquire, Benjamin Wyman Bull, Esquire, Chief Counsel, Scottsdale, AZ, James Bopp, Jr., Esquire, Anita Yvonne Woudenberg, Terre Haute, IN, for Plaintiff–Appellant. Charles Arnold Grube, Assistant Attorney General, Paula S. Bickett, Esquire, Chief Counsel, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendants–Appellees.

ORDER


THOMAS, Circuit Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35–3.

Judges McKeown and Murguia did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.


Summaries of

Wolfson v. Concannon

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Sep 26, 2014
768 F.3d 999 (9th Cir. 2014)
Case details for

Wolfson v. Concannon

Case Details

Full title:Randolph WOLFSON, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Colleen CONCANNON, in her…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Date published: Sep 26, 2014

Citations

768 F.3d 999 (9th Cir. 2014)

Citing Cases

Wolfson v. Concannon

Wolfson timely appealed. After an original panel hearing, Wolfson v. Concannon, 750 F.3d 1145 (9th Cir.2014),…