From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wolford v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Nov 2, 2012
100 So. 3d 242 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. 5D12–3528.

2012-11-2

Rickie A. WOLFORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sumter County, William H. Hallman, III, Judge. Rickie A. Wolford, Crawfordville, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, For Appellee.


3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sumter County, William H. Hallman, III, Judge.
Rickie A. Wolford, Crawfordville, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, For Appellee.
PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Rickie A. Wolford, appeals the order denying his motion to correct an illegal sentence, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). He contends that the sentence imposed after conviction on two counts of lewd and lascivious conduct was vindictive. As the trial court ruled, however, and as Appellant concedes in his brief, a claim of vindictive sentencing is not reviewable under rule 3.800. He asks that we send the motion back for amendment or give him time to refile a proper motion with the court. There is nothing to amend, however, and Appellant has ample time under the Rules of Criminal Procedure to file a legally sufficient motion. The appealed order is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN, COHEN and BERGER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wolford v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Nov 2, 2012
100 So. 3d 242 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Wolford v. State

Case Details

Full title:Rickie A. WOLFORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Date published: Nov 2, 2012

Citations

100 So. 3d 242 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)