From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wolfington v. Olden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
May 2, 2013
Case No.: 2:12-CV-0242 JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. May. 2, 2013)

Opinion

Case No.: 2:12-CV-0242 JFM (PC)

05-02-2013

BILLY WOLFINGTON, Plaintiff, v. OLDEN et al., Defendant

LONGYEAR, O'DEA & LAVRA, LLP John A. Lavra, CSB No.: 114533 Kelley S. Kern, CSB No: 221265 Attorneys for Defendants, J. Oldham ; P. Chand; M. Castaneda; M. Barrientos; D. Deneau; and R. Capel By: BILLY WOLFINGTON, PLAINTIFF


LONGYEAR, O'DEA & LAVRA, LLP
John A. Lavra, CSB No.: 114533
Kelley S. Kern, CSB No: 221265
Attorneys for Defendants,
J. Oldham ;
P. Chand;
M. Castaneda;
M. Barrientos;
D. Deneau; and
R. Capel

STIPULATION TO DISMISS CASE IN

ITS ENTIRETY, WITH PREJUDICE,

AGAINST ALL NAMED DEFENDANTS

INCLUDING ANY CLAIMS AGAINST

"OFFICER CASTAWEON."

Plaintiff named Officer Castaweon as a Defendant in this lawsuit. After initially filing an Answer on behalf of "Officer Castaweon," Defendants Oldham, Chand, Castaneda, Barrientos, Deneau, and Capel determined that Yolo County does not employ an Officer Castaweon, and asked the Court to withdraw the Answer previously filed on his behalf. Thereafter, Plaintiff agreed to dismiss his Complaint against Defendants Oldham, Chand, Castaneda, Barrientos, Deneau, and Capel and the parties filed a Stipulation and Order regarding dismissal of the case.

As there is no one employed by Yolo County by the name of Castaweon, the parties hereby stipulate that the dismissal of the lawsuit against all Defendants was intended to include "Officer Castaweon." It is Plaintiff's intention to dismiss the case in its entirety, with prejudice, including any claims against "Officer Castaweon."

It is hereby Stipulated.

_________________

By: BILLY WOLFINGTON,

PLAINTIFF

LONGYEAR, O'DEA & LAVRA, LLP

By: _______________

JOHN A. LAVRA

KELLEY S. KERN

ORDER

It is hereby ordered. The case is dismissed, with prejudice, in its entirety, against all named Defendants.

_________________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

PROOF OF SERVICE

CASE: Wolfington vs. Olden et al.
COURT: United States District Court
CASE NO.: 2:12-cv-0242 JFM (PC)

I am employed in the County of Sacramento. I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within above-entitled action. My business address is 3620 American River Dr. Ste. 230, Sacramento, CA 95864.

I am familiar with this office's practice whereby the mail is sealed, given the appropriate postage and placed in a designated mail collection area. Each day's mail is collected and deposited in a United States mailbox after the close of each day's business.

On May 2, 2013, I served the following:

STIPULATION TO DISMISS CASE IN ITS ENTIRETY, WITH PREJUDICE, AGAINST ALL NAMED DEFENDANTS INCLUDING ANY CLAIMS AGAINST "OFFICER CASTAWEON."

XX United States Mail - on all parties in said action by placing a true copy of the above-described document(s) enclosed in a sealed envelope in the designated area for outgoing mail addressed as set forth below. Billy Wolfington
115360
MONROE DETENTION CENTER
140 "A" Tony Diaz Drive
Woodland, CA 95776-5194

_________________

An Employee of Longyear, O'Dea & Lavra LLP


Summaries of

Wolfington v. Olden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
May 2, 2013
Case No.: 2:12-CV-0242 JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. May. 2, 2013)
Case details for

Wolfington v. Olden

Case Details

Full title:BILLY WOLFINGTON, Plaintiff, v. OLDEN et al., Defendant

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

Date published: May 2, 2013

Citations

Case No.: 2:12-CV-0242 JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. May. 2, 2013)