From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wolff v. Friedman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 6, 1989
148 A.D.2d 448 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

March 6, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Morrison, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Pursuant to a lease, the plaintiffs Marc Wolff and Adam Malawista, students at Syracuse University, rented an apartment from the defendants, located in Onondaga County. Their parents, the plaintiffs Eugene Wolff and Fred Malawista, cosigned the lease as guarantors. At the termination of the lease, the defendants refused to return the plaintiffs' $500 security deposit and demanded payment for damages allegedly caused by the tenants to the leased premises in excess of the retained security deposit. The damages were allegedly repaired by independent contractors, residing in Onondaga County.

The plaintiffs subsequently commenced this action in the Supreme Court, Nassau County, to recover the security deposit. The defendants interposed a counterclaim to recover damages for property damage to the leased premises. Thereafter, the defendants moved for a change of venue to Onondaga County, pursuant to CPLR 510 (3).

We find that cause of action arose in Onondaga County and, absent cogent reasons to direct otherwise, venue should be in the county where the cause of action arose (see, Cola-Rugg Enters. v Consolidated Edison Co., 109 A.D.2d 726; Miller v. Ward, 14 A.D.2d 728; see also, McComb v. Hilton Hgts. Apts., 43 A.D.2d 972). The only nexus Nassau County has to this action on a contract made in Onondaga and providing for its performance in Onondaga County is the fact that it is the permanent residence of guarantor Eugene Wolff and tenant Marc Wolff. The latter, however, continues to reside in Onondaga County, while attending Syracuse University. Despite technical defects in the defendants' motion papers, they demonstrate that the convenience of the witnesses will be promoted by changing the place of trial to Onondaga County (see, Chiappa v. Macaluso, 96 A.D.2d 895; O'Neill v. Kohls, 12 A.D.2d 888; Wilson v. Orser, 243 App. Div. 855). Mangano, J.P., Lawrence, Rubin and Kooper, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wolff v. Friedman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 6, 1989
148 A.D.2d 448 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Wolff v. Friedman

Case Details

Full title:MARC WOLFF et al., Appellants, v. JUNE FRIEDMAN et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 6, 1989

Citations

148 A.D.2d 448 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
538 N.Y.S.2d 604

Citing Cases

Jansen v. Bernhang

Here, the movants' papers suffice to demonstrate that at least three prospective witnesses live in New York…

Creed v. United Hospital

Ordered that the defendants, appearing separately and filing separate briefs, are awarded one bill of costs.…