From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wolfe v. Knight

City Court of New York — General Term
Jan 1, 1896
15 Misc. 438 (N.Y. City Ct. 1896)

Opinion

January, 1896.

Nathan Lewis, for appellant.

Henry Merzbach, for respondents.


The order of September 17, 1895, which purports to adjudge the judgment debtor guilty of misconduct constituting a civil contempt omitted to declare that it had been ascertained and determined that the misconduct complained of defeated, impaired, impeded or prejudiced the rights or remedies of the party to the proceeding, and because of this alone it was fatally defective ( Wolf v. Buttner, 6 Misc. 119; 26 N.Y.S. 25) and must be reversed.

It is not enough that property is found in the hands of the judgment debtor.

Besides, the proceedings appear to have been dismissed by an order of Justice CONLAN and in proper form.

If there was any irregularity in the mode of dismissal, plaintiff could only take advantage of it by application to set it aside and revive the proceedings. Without such the court had no jurisdiction and could not punish the defendant.

Order is, therefore, reversed, vacated and set aside, with costs.

FITZSIMONS, J., concurs.

Order reversed, with costs.


Summaries of

Wolfe v. Knight

City Court of New York — General Term
Jan 1, 1896
15 Misc. 438 (N.Y. City Ct. 1896)
Case details for

Wolfe v. Knight

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM L. WOLFE et al., Respondents, v . GEORGE M. KNIGHT, Appellant

Court:City Court of New York — General Term

Date published: Jan 1, 1896

Citations

15 Misc. 438 (N.Y. City Ct. 1896)
37 N.Y.S. 210