Opinion
Editorial Note:
This opinion appears in the Federal reporter in a table titled "Table of Decisions Without Reported Opinions". (See FI CTA9 Rule 36-3 regarding use of unpublished opinions)
Argued and Submitted April 12, 1994.
Appeal from the United States District Court, for the Northern District of California, D.C. No. CV-91-2389-CAL; Charles A. Legge, District Judge, Presiding.
Argued and Submitted April 12, 1994 San Francisco, California
N.D.Cal.
AFFIRMED.
Before: FLETCHER, FERGUSON and TROTT, Circuit Judges.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Burton Wolfe challenges the district court's dismissal of this action for failure to state a claim. Wolfe raised all of the claims in this suit in the companion case, Chan v. Miller, No. 92-16139. We affirm the district court judgment for the reasons we articulated in our memorandum disposition in Chan.
We also affirm the district court's denial of Wolfe's motion to remand to state court. Any state law claims are preempted by § 301(a) of the Labor Management Relations Act. 29 U.S.C. § 185(a) (1988). See Chan at 6.
The district court judgment is AFFIRMED.