Opinion
Case No. 3:13-cv-02180-PK
04-29-2014
ROBERT WOLFE, Plaintiff, v. KATE BROWN, Secretary of State of Oregon, Defendant.
Ross A. Day T. Beau Ellis DAY LAW GROUP, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff Sarah K. Weston Carson L. Whitehead OREGON DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Special Litigation Unit Attorneys for Defendants
ORDER
Ross A. Day
T. Beau Ellis
DAY LAW GROUP, P.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiff Sarah K. Weston
Carson L. Whitehead
OREGON DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Special Litigation Unit
Attorneys for Defendants HERNANDEZ, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued a Findings and Recommendation [22] on March 12, 2014, recommending that Defendant's motion to dismiss [7] be granted and that this action be dismissed. Plaintiff filed timely objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation, as here, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).
I have carefully considered Plaintiff's objections and conclude that these objections do not provide a basis to modify the Findings and Recommendation. I have also reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and find no error in the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation [22]. Accordingly, Defendants' motion to dismiss [7] is GRANTED and this action is dismissed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
____________________
MARCO A. HERNANDEZ
United States District Judge