Opinion
23-cv-20244-BLOOM/Otazo-Reyes
05-26-2023
ORDER ON UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR STAY
BETH BLOOM, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Defendants' Unopposed Motion to Stay Case, ECF No. [14] (“Motion”), filed on May 25, 2023. Therein, Defendants assert that this case has the same defendants and presents the same jurisdictional and forum non conveniens issues as a case currently pending before the Honorable Lawrence King, John Doe (V.H.), as parent and natural guardian of T.H., a minor v. Hyatt Hotels Corporation et al, No. 1:22-cv-20923-JLK (the “V.H. Case”). ECF No. [14] at 2. In that case, the jurisdictional and forum non conveniens issues have been fully briefed. Id. at 2. The parties urge the Court to stay this case pending a decision in the V.H. Case before Judge King, because a decision in that case “is likely to have a substantial or controlling effect on the claims and issues” in this case. Id. at 3 (citing Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida v. S. Florida Water Mgmt. Dist., 559 F.3d 1191, 1198 (11th Cir. 2009)).
In light of the parties' agreement, the Court agrees that a stay is appropriate and in the interest of judicial economy. See Morrissey v. Subaru of America, Inc., No. 15-cv-21106, 2015 WL 4512641, at *2 (S.D. Fla. July 24, 2015) (granting a stay in similar circumstances, despite one party's opposition).
Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
1. Defendants' Motion, ECF No. [14], is GRANTED.
2. This case is STAYED pending a decision on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss that is pending in the V.H. Case before Judge King, Case No. 1:22-cv-20923.
3. No less than seven days after a ruling is rendered in the V.H. Case, the parties shall file a Joint Notice setting forth Judge King's decision and addressing that decision's effect, if any, on this case. Upon receipt of that Notice, the Court will set a deadline for Defendants to respond to the Complaint.
4. The Clerk shall ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE the case.
DONE AND ORDERED.