From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wolf v. Furie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 6, 1946
270 App. Div. 939 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)

Opinion

May 6, 1946.


Action to recover, by way of damages, the amount of commissions which plaintiff alleges he would have received had not the defendant, as a purchaser of real property, by virtue of a conspiracy, false and fraudulent representations, and breach of contract deprived him thereof. Order denying motion of defendant for judgment on the pleadings reversed on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with $10 costs. There are no factual allegations upon which can be predicated the conclusion that the sale had been effected through the instrumentality of plaintiff as broker. ( Newberry Co. v. Warnecke Co., 267 App. Div. 418, affd. 293 N.Y. 698; Sieven v. Glazer, 267 App. Div. 969, motion for leave to appeal denied, 292 N.Y. 726; Sieven v. Glazer, 268 App. Div. 1052.) Lewis, P.J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wolf v. Furie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 6, 1946
270 App. Div. 939 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)
Case details for

Wolf v. Furie

Case Details

Full title:SAUL WOLF, Respondent, v. IRVING FURIE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 6, 1946

Citations

270 App. Div. 939 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)