From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wolf v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division
Dec 8, 2010
Civil No. 09-422-HU (D. Or. Dec. 8, 2010)

Opinion

Civil No. 09-422-HU.

December 8, 2010


ORDER


Magistrate Judge Hubel referred to this court a Findings and Recommendation [21] in this matter. The Magistrate Judge recommends affirming the Commissioner's decision denying plaintiff's application for Supplemental Security Income (SSI).

No objections were filed, and the case was referred to this court. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. Campbell v. United States Dist. Ct., 501 F.2d 196 (9th Cir. 1974).

No clear error appears on the face of the record. This court adopts the Findings and Recommendation in its entirety.

CONCLUSION

The court adopts the Findings and Recommendation [21]. The Commissioner's decision denying plaintiff's application for Supplemental Security Income (SSI) is affirmed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 8 day of December, 2010.


Summaries of

Wolf v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division
Dec 8, 2010
Civil No. 09-422-HU (D. Or. Dec. 8, 2010)
Case details for

Wolf v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:RICK WOLF, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division

Date published: Dec 8, 2010

Citations

Civil No. 09-422-HU (D. Or. Dec. 8, 2010)