Opinion
No. 06:12-cv-00512-AC
08-06-2013
SONIA D. WOBBE, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.
ORDER :
Magistrate Judge Acosta issued a Findings & Recommendation (#20) on July 2, 2013, in which he recommends the Court affirm the Commissioner's decision to deny Plaintiff's applications for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income.
Plaintiff has timely filed objections to the Findings & Recommendation. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).
I have carefully considered Plaintiff's objections and conclude there is no basis to modify the Findings & Recommendation. I have also reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and find no other errors in the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings & Recommendation [#20], and therefore, the Commissioner's decision is affirmed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 6 day of August, 2013.
/s/_________
MARCO A. HERNANDEZ
United States District Judge