From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wittemann v. Giele

Court of Errors and Appeals
Mar 3, 1924
123 A. 716 (N.J. 1924)

Opinion

Argued December 4, 1923 —

Decided March 3, 1924.

1. Striking out a sham or frivolous plea is not an infringement of the right of trial by jury.

2. The finding of the judge, upon such a motion, that the defendant failed to show such facts as he deemed sufficient to entitle him to defend, must be assumed to be true until the contrary appears.

On appeal from the Supreme Court.

For the respondent, Collins Corbin.

For the appellants, Weinberger Weinberger.


This is an appeal from a summary judgment.

The action is founded upon six promissory notes made by the Wittemann Aircraft Corporation, payable to the plaintiff, or order, all of which were endorsed by the defendant Giele, and four of which were endorsed by the defendant O'Leary.

This suit was against the endorsers. The defense was that defendants were accommodation endorsers for the plaintiff, at his request and without consideration.

Plaintiff moved to strike out the answers upon the ground that they were sham and frivolous. They could not be both. The order striking them out recites that the notice was to strike out on the ground that they were sham or frivolous, but did not adjudge that they were either. From the testimony in the cause it may reasonably be assumed that the answers were struck out as untrue or sham.

The defendants' appeal and their contention is that the Supreme Court erred in ordering that the answers be stricken out and summary judgment entered because the questions involved, being questions of fact, the defendants were entitled to have them submitted to and passed upon by a jury.

The complete answer, making defendants' contention untenable, is to be found in the opinion of this court in Eisele King v. Raphael, 90 N.J.L. 219.

The finding of the judge making the order to strike out must be assumed to be true until the contrary appears. The contrary does not appear in this case and the finding must, therefore, be taken as correct.

The judgment below is affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, KALISCH, CAMPBELL, KATZENBACH, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, CLARK, JJ. 9.

For reversal — PARKER, J. 1.


Summaries of

Wittemann v. Giele

Court of Errors and Appeals
Mar 3, 1924
123 A. 716 (N.J. 1924)
Case details for

Wittemann v. Giele

Case Details

Full title:ADOLPH WITTEMANN, RESPONDENT, v. LOUIS A. GIELE AND JOHN J. O'LEARY…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Mar 3, 1924

Citations

123 A. 716 (N.J. 1924)
123 A. 716

Citing Cases

Pyle v. Fid. Philadelphia Trust Co.

Striking out a truly frivolous complaint or answer is not an infringement of the right of trial by jury.…

National Surety Corp. v. Clement

Striking out a sham or frivolous plea is not an infringement of the right of trial by jury. A plea of general…