From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Witherspoon v. Deere & Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Jan 26, 2012
Case No. 3:11-0345 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 26, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 3:11-0345

01-26-2012

JOE B. WITHERSPOON, Plaintiff, v. DEERE & COMPANY, et al., Defendants.


Judge Haynes/Bryant

ORDER

A settlement conference will be held with the parties in this matter on Tuesday, February 28, 2012, at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom 776, 801 Broadway, Nashville, Tennessee.

The parties are advised that they should not schedule anything else on this date and should be prepared to spend the entire day in this settlement conference, if necessary. If any party has other engagements that would interfere with the settlement conference at any time during the day, such party must notify the Magistrate Judge of this fact in advance of the settlement conference.

The parties are advised that unless otherwise permitted, failure to be present with full settlement authority could result in imposition of sanctions pursuant to Rule 16(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. If the parties need authority from any other person, that person must be available by phone, and the Magistrate Judge must approve the absence in advance. The representative present at the settlement conference must be in a position to sign a binding agreement at the conclusion of the conference, unless the Magistrate Judge has been notified of the limitation in advance.

All named parties and their attorneys must attend, unless excused in advance by the Magistrate Judge. Non-individual parties must have a senior official present unless excused in advance by the Magistrate Judge. "Full settlement authority" means the ability of the plaintiff to accept the last offer and the defendant to pay the last demand. If authority is limited, the party must notify the Magistrate Judge in advance of the conference.
--------

1. By 12:00 noon on Friday, February 24, 2012, plaintiff and defendants shall deliver under seal, directly to Tina McDonald, Courtroom Deputy to the undersigned, 797 U.S. Courthouse, 801 Broadway, Nashville, TN 37203, confidential settlement conference statements which shall specify their respective settlement positions. These settlement conference statements shall not be filed with the Clerk nor served on the other parties. Nothing in the way of a jury speech shall be contained in the settlement conference statements. In their respective statements, counsel for plaintiff and defendant shall make a candid assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of both sides of the case and shall give a good faith opinion of each client's probable success on the merits on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being the lowest and 5 being the highest.

a. Each statement shall contain a summary of the parties' respective views of the law as to the theories of liability or defense.
b. (P) Plaintiff's statement shall contain an assessment from plaintiff's viewpoint of hisits damages and the strengths and weaknesses of his position.
b. (D) Defendants' statement shall contain an assessment of the plaintiff's damages, defendants' exposure to those damages, and the respective strengths and weaknesses of defendants' position.
c. Each statement shall contain an assessment of the economic cost of proceeding to trial as well as any appeal.
d. Each statement shall recount, with specificity, the settlement discussions between the parties to date and the most recent demand offer as each side has made.
e. Each statement will describe any particular obstacles or impediments to settlement.

2. In the event offers and demands have not previously been made, the parties shall exchange offers and demands at least three (3) working days prior to the February 28, 2012 conference.

3. Counsel for each party may present a brief opening statement at the beginning of the settlement conference. Following these statements, the Magistrate Judge will normally meet separately with the parties. Once the separate meetings have concluded, negotiations will proceed as necessitated by the particular case.

It is so ORDERED.

_______________

JOHN S. BRYANT

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Witherspoon v. Deere & Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Jan 26, 2012
Case No. 3:11-0345 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 26, 2012)
Case details for

Witherspoon v. Deere & Co.

Case Details

Full title:JOE B. WITHERSPOON, Plaintiff, v. DEERE & COMPANY, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Jan 26, 2012

Citations

Case No. 3:11-0345 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 26, 2012)