From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wise v. U.S. Dep't of Agric.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Feb 3, 2015
592 F. App'x 203 (4th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

No. 14-1947

02-03-2015

EDDIE WISE; DOROTHY MONROE-WISE, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE; JAMES DAVENPORT, Individually; MIKE HUSKEY, Individually; AARON A. MARTIN, Individually; JUAN M. GARCIA, Individually; TOM VILSACK, In his official capacity as the Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture; PAULA F. NICHOLLS, Individually; DEBBIE HOUSTON, Individually; CYNTHIA I. KERNODLE, Individually; JOE LEONARD, In his official capacity as Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights of United States Department of Agriculture, Defendants - Appellees.

Eddie Wise, Dorothy Monroe-Wise, Appellants Pro Se. Neal Fowler, Assistant United States Attorney, Thomas Gray Walker, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (4:13-cv-00234-BO) Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eddie Wise, Dorothy Monroe-Wise, Appellants Pro Se. Neal Fowler, Assistant United States Attorney, Thomas Gray Walker, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Appellants Eddie Wise and Dorothy Monroe-Wise appeal the district court's orders denying their motion for an evidentiary hearing and granting the Defendants' motion to dismiss their civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Wise v. U.S. Dep't of Agric., No. 4:13-cv-00234-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 27, 2014; Aug. 19, 2014). We grant Appellants leave to proceed in forma pauperis but deny their other pending motions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Wise v. U.S. Dep't of Agric.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Feb 3, 2015
592 F. App'x 203 (4th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

Wise v. U.S. Dep't of Agric.

Case Details

Full title:EDDIE WISE; DOROTHY MONROE-WISE, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. UNITED STATES…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Feb 3, 2015

Citations

592 F. App'x 203 (4th Cir. 2015)

Citing Cases

Wise v. United States

On February 3, 2015, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision…

Alford v. Rosenberg

Alford has submitted affidavits of service for Rosenberg and Cobert, but not for the Attorney General or for…