Wise v. Ozmint

3 Citing cases

  1. Evans v. Byars

    Case No. 8:16-cv-03811-TMC-JDA (D.S.C. Jul. 27, 2017)

    " C.A. No. 6:13-cv-3414-RMG-KFM, 2015 WL 3902192, at *4 (D.S.C. June 24, 2015), appeal dismissed, 625 F. App'x 221 (4th Cir. 2015) (per curiam). However, other authority supports tolling the statute of limitations only until the date on which the inmate was due a final response to a grievance.

  2. Rumph v. Colvin

    Civil Action No. 8:14-cv-02122-JMC (D.S.C. Jan. 11, 2017)

    Because Plaintiff is not a prisoner, she is not afforded the benefit of the mailbox rule under Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988), and her objection is deemed filed on the date the clerk's office received it. See Torras Herreria y Construcciones, S.A. v. M/V Timur Star, 803 F.2d 215, 216 (6th Cir. 1986); Wise v. Ozmint, No. 6:13-cv-3414-RMG, 2015 WL 3902192, at *3 (D.S.C. June 24, 2015); Gerald v. Lee, No. 4:12-cv-02516-RBH, 2012 WL 6727357, at *1 (D.S.C. Dec. 28, 2012). Accordingly, the court finds that Plaintiff filed her objection after the period for doing so expired.

  3. Rumph v. Colvin

    Civil Action No. 8:14-cv-02122-JMC (D.S.C. Jan. 11, 2017)

    Because Plaintiff is not a prisoner, she is not afforded the benefit of the mailbox rule under Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988), and her objection is deemed filed on the date the clerk's office received it. See Torras Herreria y Construcciones, S.A. v. M/V Timur Star, 803 F.2d 215, 216 (6th Cir. 1986); Wise v. Ozmint, No. 6:13-cv-3414-RMG, 2015 WL 3902192, at *3 (D.S.C. June 24, 2015); Gerald v. Lee, No. 4:12-cv-02516-RBH, 2012 WL 6727357, at *1 (D.S.C. Dec. 28, 2012). Accordingly, the court finds that Plaintiff filed her objection after the period for doing so expired.