From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wise v. Moore

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Jan 30, 2008
Case No. 2:07-cv-016 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 30, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. 2:07-cv-016.

January 30, 2008


ORDER


On October 12, 2007, Magistrate Judge Abel issued a Report and Recommendation, recommending that the Court dismiss Petitioner's habeas action as barred by the one-year statute of limitations set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). (Record at 11. Petitioner was notified of his right to file objections to the Report and Recommendation, and advised that if he failed to do so within ten days, he would waive his right to a de novo review by the district judge and waive his right to appeal the judgment of the district court.

Petitioner was served with a copy of the Report and Recommendation by certified mail, and was granted an extension of time to file objections, but has failed to file any objections within the time allotted. The Court therefore ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Abel's Report and Recommendation, and DISMISSES this case with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Wise v. Moore

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Jan 30, 2008
Case No. 2:07-cv-016 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 30, 2008)
Case details for

Wise v. Moore

Case Details

Full title:ANTWON WISE, Petitioner, v. ERNIE MOORE, WARDEN, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Jan 30, 2008

Citations

Case No. 2:07-cv-016 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 30, 2008)

Citing Cases

Hysell v. Warden, Ross Corr. Inst.

Further, where a petitioner signs a guilty plea acknowledging that he understands his right to appeal, his…