From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wis. Manufacturers & Commerce v. Evers

Supreme Court of Wisconsin
Jan 23, 2023
2023 WI 5 (Wis. 2023)

Opinion

2020AP2081-AC2020AP2109-AC

01-23-2023

Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce, Muskego Area Chamber of Commerce and New Berlin Chamber of Commerce and Visitors Bureau, Plaintiffs-Respondents-Petitioners, v. Tony Evers, in his official capacity as Governor of Wisconsin, Karen Timberlake, in her official capacity as Interim Secretary of the Wisconsin Department of Health Services and Joel Brennan, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Wisconsin Department of Administration, Defendants, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Intervenor-Appellant.


The Court entered the following order on this date:

¶1 Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce filed a motion for reconsideration of our decision in Wisconsin Manufacturers & Commerce v. Evers, 2022 WI 38, 401 Wis.2d 699, 974 N.W.2d 753. The State Defendants and the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel opposed WMC's motion. We deny the motion for reconsideration without costs.

¶2 We nevertheless file this memorandum on the motion to address one of WMC's arguments, namely that this Court should clarify that footnote 9 of the court of appeals' decision has no precedential value. See Wis Mfrs & Commerce v Evers, 2021 WI.App. 35, ¶24 n9, 398 Wis.2d 164, 960 N.W.2d 442; see also Wis Sup. Ct. IOP III.J ("A motion for reconsideration may result in the court's issuing a corrective or explanatory memorandum to its opinion without changing the original mandate") We conclude that, in this case, footnote 9 of the court of appeals' decision has no precedential value We leave for another day the issue of whether the rule from Blum v. 1st Auto & Cas. Ins. Co., 2010 WI 78, ¶46, 326 Wis.2d 729, 786 N.W.2d 78, that "[u]nless this court explicitly states otherwise, a court of appeals opinion overruled by this court no longer retains any precedential value," should be extended to cover the present situation. See also Showers Appraisals, LLC v. Musson Bros., 2013 WI 79, ¶71 n4, 350 Wis.2d 509, 835 N.W.2d 226 (Crooks, J, concurring).

¶3 IT IS ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration is denied without costs.


Summaries of

Wis. Manufacturers & Commerce v. Evers

Supreme Court of Wisconsin
Jan 23, 2023
2023 WI 5 (Wis. 2023)
Case details for

Wis. Manufacturers & Commerce v. Evers

Case Details

Full title:Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce, Muskego Area Chamber of Commerce and…

Court:Supreme Court of Wisconsin

Date published: Jan 23, 2023

Citations

2023 WI 5 (Wis. 2023)

Citing Cases

Secura Supreme Ins. Co. v. The Estate of Huck

Although the majority affirms the decision on a different basis, it does not expressly--or even…

Mosley v. Oakwood Lutheran Senior Ministries

Significantly, however, our supreme court clarified on a motion for reconsideration that this footnote has no…