From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Winkleman v. CDCR

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Mar 10, 2015
2:13-cv-1480 MCE DAD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 10, 2015)

Opinion


JOHN PATRICK WINKLEMAN, Plaintiff, v. CDCR, Defendants. No. 2:13-cv-1480 MCE DAD P United States District Court, E.D. California. March 10, 2015

          ORDER

          MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., Chief District Judge.

         Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

         On January 14, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

         The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. The findings and recommendations filed January 14, 2015 (ECF No. 27), are ADOPTED in full;

         2. Defendants' motion to dismiss (ECF No. 15) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows:

a. Defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's suit for damages against defendant CDCR is GRANTED;

b. Defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's request for injunctive relief against defendant CDCR is GRANTED;

c. Defendant CDCR is DISMISSED from this action;

d. Defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint for failure to state a claim against defendants Anthony and Nicolau is DENIED;

e. Defendants' motion to dismiss based on the affirmative defense of qualified immunity is DENIED; and

3. Defendants Anthony and Nicolau are directed to file an answer within thirty (30) days of the order adopting these findings and recommendations.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Winkleman v. CDCR

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Mar 10, 2015
2:13-cv-1480 MCE DAD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 10, 2015)
Case details for

Winkleman v. CDCR

Case Details

Full title:JOHN PATRICK WINKLEMAN, Plaintiff, v. CDCR, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 10, 2015

Citations

2:13-cv-1480 MCE DAD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 10, 2015)