From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Winkle v. Loranger

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Aug 19, 2014
Case No. 3:14-cv-20 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 19, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 3:14-cv-20

08-19-2014

MARK R. WINKLE, Plaintiff, v. CAROL LORANGER, et al., Defendant.



Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. #45), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

The Court hereby certifies to the United States Court of Appeals that Plaintiff's appeal (USCA Case No. 14-3758) is not taken in good faith and he should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. August 19, 2014

*s/Thomas M. Rose

Thomas M. Rose

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Winkle v. Loranger

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Aug 19, 2014
Case No. 3:14-cv-20 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 19, 2014)
Case details for

Winkle v. Loranger

Case Details

Full title:MARK R. WINKLE, Plaintiff, v. CAROL LORANGER, et al., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Aug 19, 2014

Citations

Case No. 3:14-cv-20 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 19, 2014)