From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wingo v. 3M Co.

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Jul 17, 2024
22-CV-996 (ADM/JFD) (D. Minn. Jul. 17, 2024)

Opinion

22-CV-993 (ADM/JFD) 22-CV-994 (ADM/JFD) 22-CV-996 (ADM/JFD) 22-CV-998 (ADM/JFD) 22-CV-1890 (ADM/JFD) 22-CV-1904 (ADM/JFD)

07-17-2024

JOHN WINGO, Plaintiff, v. 3M COMPANY, Defendant. ROBERT RIEGER, Plaintiff, v. 3M COMPANY, Defendant. TITUS KARGBO, Plaintiff, v. 3M COMPANY, Defendant. DESIREE HOLLER, Plaintiff, v. 3M COMPANY, Defendant. VAUGHN WINGO, Plaintiff, v. 3M COMPANY, Defendant. NEVELY RANDLE, Plaintiff, v. 3M COMPANY, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

ANN D. MONTGOMERY United States District Judge

Based upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty, and after an independent review of the files, records, and proceedings in the above-entitled matters, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Complaints in these actions (Doc. No. 19 in 22-CV-993; Doc. No. 17 in 22-CV-994; Doc. No. 16 in 22-CV-996; Doc. No. 18 in 22-CV-998; Doc. No. 1 in 22-CV-1890; Doc. No. 4 in 22-CV-1904) are dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

Wingo v. 3M Co.

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Jul 17, 2024
22-CV-996 (ADM/JFD) (D. Minn. Jul. 17, 2024)
Case details for

Wingo v. 3M Co.

Case Details

Full title:JOHN WINGO, Plaintiff, v. 3M COMPANY, Defendant. ROBERT RIEGER, Plaintiff…

Court:United States District Court, District of Minnesota

Date published: Jul 17, 2024

Citations

22-CV-996 (ADM/JFD) (D. Minn. Jul. 17, 2024)