From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wingert v. Navarie Aznar, S.A. Bilbao

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Mar 14, 1961
196 F. Supp. 585 (D. Or. 1961)

Opinion

Civ. No. 60-398.

March 14, 1961.

Pozzi, Levin Wilson, Portland, Or., for plaintiff.

Wood, Wood, Tatum, Mosser Brooke, Portland, Or., for defendant.


This case is now before the court on the motion of defendant for an order quashing the service of summons and complaint on the ground that the defendant is a foreign corporation not doing business within the State of Oregon and not subject to jurisdiction of this court.

The defendant Navarie Aznar, S.A., is a Spanish corporation which owns and operates approximately 30 vessels. Kerr Steamship Company, Inc., a Delaware corporation, which maintains an office in Portland, Oregon, as well as in other ports throughout the United States, is the general agent for the company in the United States. However, the only contacts defendant has had with this district have been two calls made by one of its vessels, the S.S. Monte Pagasari, once at the time of plaintiff's injury and a second time, six months later, just prior to the service of summons. It also appears that it has had no other contact in the district through its agent, Kerr. Kerr's activities on the two occasions the vessel was here were in its capacity as an independent time charterer and not as an agent.

In my view, these contacts fail to meet the minimal standards as set forth in International Shoe Co. v. State of Washington, 326 U.S. 310, 66 S.Ct. 154, 90 L.Ed. 95; Andrade v. American Mail Lines, D.C.D.R.I. 1947, 71 F. Supp. 201; Higgins v. California Tanker Co., D.C.E.D.Pa. 1957, 166 F. Supp. 569. See also Dawson v. Alaska S.S. Co., D.C.S.D.N.Y. 1952, 12 F.R.D. 527; Rutter v. Louis Dreyfus Corporation, D.C.E.D.Pa. 1960, 181 F. Supp. 531.

The cases relied upon by plaintiff in opposition to the motion, Green v. Compania de Nav. Isabella, D.C.S.D.N.Y., 26 F. Supp. 616, 1960 A.M.C. 2131, and Nuzzo v. Compania Globo de Navegacion, D.C.S.D.N.Y. 1960, Am.Mar.Cas. 2136, are not in point.

Defendant's motion to quash is hereby granted.


Summaries of

Wingert v. Navarie Aznar, S.A. Bilbao

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Mar 14, 1961
196 F. Supp. 585 (D. Or. 1961)
Case details for

Wingert v. Navarie Aznar, S.A. Bilbao

Case Details

Full title:Wayne WINGERT, Plaintiff, v. NAVARIE AZNAR, S.A. BILBAO, a corporation…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Mar 14, 1961

Citations

196 F. Supp. 585 (D. Or. 1961)

Citing Cases

Stewart v. Allied Construction and Engineering Company

Defendants' citations are not germane. In Wingert v. Navarie Aznar, S.A. Bilbao, 196 F. Supp. 585 (D.Or.…

Gkiafis v. Steamship Yiosonas

In some the shipowner operated a large number of vessels that never came to the port, in others the cause of…