From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wine v. Halterman

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jun 24, 2011
EDCV 09-1943-VAP (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 24, 2011)

Opinion


DAVID L. WINE, Plaintiff, v. J. HALTERMAN, et al., Defendants. No. EDCV 09-1943-VAP (JEM) United States District Court, C.D. California. June 24, 2011

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 638, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No written Objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss be denied. Defendants shall file an Answer to the Complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order.


Summaries of

Wine v. Halterman

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jun 24, 2011
EDCV 09-1943-VAP (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 24, 2011)
Case details for

Wine v. Halterman

Case Details

Full title:DAVID L. WINE, Plaintiff, v. J. HALTERMAN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Jun 24, 2011

Citations

EDCV 09-1943-VAP (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 24, 2011)